Kristina Novak vs Daniela Glanzer Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 23 Jun at 10:32 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
K. Novak vs D. Glanzer

SLO
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUT
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Novak 1 - 0 Glanzer
They have played 2 sets in total, with Kristina Novak winning 2 and Daniela Glanzer winning 0. The last match between Kristina Novak and Daniela Glanzer was at the W35 Tarvisio, 23-06-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Kristina Novak getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Novak | 1 |
| Glanzer | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) W35 Tarvisio(06-23-25)
K. Novak vs D. Glanzer H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 48.66% (91-96) | Career Total W/L | 43.08% (28-37) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
K. Novak vs D. Glanzer Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Novak displays significantly better performance, securing 37.64% of points on their second serve compared to Glanzer's 0%. Does this give Novak an edge on serve? Absolutely.
- Return Game Stats: Novak dominates with a 51.8% success rate on opponent's second serves and 34.32% on first serves, while Glanzer remains at 0% for both.
- Under Pressure: Novak's ability to save 49.18% of breakpoints suggests better composure, compared to Glanzer's inability to save any.
- Overall Match Performance: Novak's win rate over the past year stands at 52.38%, overshadowing Glanzer's 33.33%.
- Best Surface: Though Glanzer excels on indoor hard courts with a 71% win rate, Novak's overall win percentages across surfaces are more consistent.
- Player Level: Novak participates more frequently in higher-level tournaments, winning 54.17% of matches, while Glanzer's lower percentage indicates less exposure to higher-caliber competition.
- Opponent Quality: Glanzer typically faces higher-ranked opponents with an average rank of 151.67, while Novak's opponents average a rank of 288.05.
- Deciding Set Performance: Glanzer shines in deciding sets, winning 50% compared to Novak’s 18%, potentially a crucial factor if the match extends to a deciding set.
- Break Point Conversion: Novak's 43.28% conversion rate showcases an ability to capitalize on critical opportunities, unlike Glanzer, who has yet to convert any.
Editorial Prediction (June 23, 2025, UTC):
Examining the recent performance patterns, it is evident that Novak holds a distinct advantage in crucial statistics such as second serve and return game efficiency. His ability to convert breakpoints and handle pressure situations effectively positions him favorably in this matchup.
While Glanzer displays potential in deciding set scenarios and indoor hard courts, Novak's overall consistent performance across different surfaces and opponent levels underscores his superiority.
Assessing the detailed statistics, including the significant disparity in recent form and tournament success rates, Novak emerges as the likely favorite to win this upcoming match against Glanzer.
Kristina Novak vs Daniela Glanzer Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
K. Novak vs D. Glanzer H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 14 |
| 1:39:33 | Average Match Time | 1:39:33 |
| 41% (28/68) | 1st Serve % | 55% (40/73) |
| 75% (21/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (20/40) |
| 40% (16/40) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (13/33) |
| 40% (6/15) | Break Pts Won % | 44% (4/9) |
| 55% (40/73) | Return Points Win % | 46% (31/68) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
K. Novak Recent Matches Played
D. Glanzer Recent Matches Played

K. Novak vs D. Glanzer Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 48.66% (91/96) | YTD Win/Loss | 43.08% (28/37) |
| 50.24% (208/206) | Sets Win/Loss | 42.96% (61/81) |
| 50.40% (1941/1910) | Games Win/Loss | 46.60% (610/699) |
| 50.00% (18/18) | Hard Win/Loss | 41.94% (13/18) |
| 47.75% (53/58) | Clay Win/Loss | 37.04% (10/17) |
| 50.00% (20/20) | Indoor Hard W/L | 71.43% (5/2) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 222 | Aces Total | 12 |
| 0.34 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 638 | Total Double Faults | 153 |
| 1:7:5 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 370.74 | Average Opponent Rank | 303.62 |
| 55% (4823/8720) | 1st Serve % | 62% (902/1453) |
| 61% (2928/4823) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (509/902) |
| 41% (1597/3897) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (210/551) |
| 48% (505/1053) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (78/169) |
| 46% (3825/8356) | Return Points Win % | 44% (662/1495) |
| 46.94% (46/52) | Challenger W/L | 30.00% (6/14) |
| 50.56% (45/44) | Futures W/L | 48.89% (22/23) |
| 49% (91/187) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 42% (27/64) |
| 43% (16/37) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (3/5) |
| 35% (14/40) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (7/13) |
| 88% (100/88) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (27/24) |
| 12% (100/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (27/3) |
| 3% (87/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (38/3) |